http://productivewise.com/twitter-reached-peak/ Productivity, Social Media, and Internet Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:16:41 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://productivewise.com/twitter-reached-peak/#comment-3318 The Twitter Hype is Over | SEOptimise Tue, 06 Jul 2010 10:53:17 +0000 http://www.productivewise.com/?p=1536#comment-3318 [...] has peaked usage and traffic-wise in January, or maybe even earlier. That’s not the main reason though. Also Google Trends still shows an increase. We had [...] [...] has peaked usage and traffic-wise in January, or maybe even earlier. That’s not the main reason though. Also Google Trends still shows an increase. We had [...]

]]> http://productivewise.com/twitter-reached-peak/#comment-3137 Derek Fri, 17 Apr 2009 00:44:38 +0000 http://www.productivewise.com/?p=1536#comment-3137 Are you serious? Why would you even post this? "Has Twitter peaked?" is the dumbest thing I've read all week. Are you serious? Why would you even post this? “Has Twitter peaked?” is the dumbest thing I've read all week.

]]> http://productivewise.com/twitter-reached-peak/#comment-3136 ptdavis Thu, 16 Apr 2009 23:02:23 +0000 http://www.productivewise.com/?p=1536#comment-3136 I agree - that's part of my point. Twitter is "search" as well, or they'd have us see it that way. So "searching" for it makes no more sense than searching for Google. I think the claim, based on the "data" presented, that Twitter has peaked is beyond ludicrous! <br>Thanks for the idea volley. I agree – that's part of my point. Twitter is “search” as well, or they'd have us see it that way. So “searching” for it makes no more sense than searching for Google. I think the claim, based on the “data” presented, that Twitter has peaked is beyond ludicrous!
Thanks for the idea volley.

]]> http://productivewise.com/twitter-reached-peak/#comment-3134 eyalsela Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:08:03 +0000 http://www.productivewise.com/?p=1536#comment-3134 well, I agree that that is not the most scientific methodology, but don't you think that looking for Google when you're in Google is not the most relevant search query? well, I agree that that is not the most scientific methodology, but don't you think that looking for Google when you're in Google is not the most relevant search query?

]]> http://productivewise.com/twitter-reached-peak/#comment-3133 eyalsela Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:06:19 +0000 http://www.productivewise.com/?p=1536#comment-3133 Possible. Possible.

]]> http://productivewise.com/twitter-reached-peak/#comment-3135 Should Twitter Follow Google, or Craigslist? « Screenwerk Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:53:40 +0000 http://www.productivewise.com/?p=1536#comment-3135 [...] a little tired of writing about Twitter, but it remains a fascinating phenomenon. One blogger asks today, has Twitter already peaked? That’s based on an alleged flattening of searches on [...] [...] a little tired of writing about Twitter, but it remains a fascinating phenomenon. One blogger asks today, has Twitter already peaked? That’s based on an alleged flattening of searches on [...]

]]> http://productivewise.com/twitter-reached-peak/#comment-3132 Dave Thu, 16 Apr 2009 12:06:41 +0000 http://www.productivewise.com/?p=1536#comment-3132 Looking more closely I just see normal variations: <a href="http://www.google.com/insights/search/#q=twitter&date=today%25203-m&cmpt=q" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/insights/search/#q=twitte...</a> Looking more closely I just see normal variations: http://www.google.com/insights/search/#q=twitte…

]]> http://productivewise.com/twitter-reached-peak/#comment-3131 ptdavis Thu, 16 Apr 2009 11:52:40 +0000 http://www.productivewise.com/?p=1536#comment-3131 According to this "methodology" Google has "plateaued" as well. Geesh.<br><a href="http://www.google.com/insights/search/#q=google&date=today%252012-m&cmpt=q" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/insights/search/#q=google...</a> According to this “methodology” Google has “plateaued” as well. Geesh.
http://www.google.com/insights/search/#q=google…

]]> http://productivewise.com/twitter-reached-peak/#comment-3130 ptdavis Thu, 16 Apr 2009 11:33:04 +0000 http://www.productivewise.com/?p=1536#comment-3130 You mean it peaked right about the time Twitter made its push into "immediate search" messaging? Could be an indication of Twitter's success there. How many people, for example, search the terms "Google"? You mean it peaked right about the time Twitter made its push into “immediate search” messaging? Could be an indication of Twitter's success there. How many people, for example, search the terms “Google”?

]]>